After an exhaustive two-year pursuit, CoinDesk has obtained documents related to Tether's reserves, following a Freedom of Information Law request filed in New York State. The result? It seems the pursuit might have been a wild goose chase, revealing no smoking guns and leaving many to wonder if this was merely a 'nothing burger.'
The controversy began in 2019 when the New York Attorney General’s office discovered an $850 million hole in Tether's reserves, caused by a loan to its sister company, Bitfinex. Since then, the company has repeatedly asserted that it has addressed the shortfall and fully backed its stablecoin, Tether (USDt). Despite this claim, the market remained skeptical, demanding more transparency and proof of these reserves.
CoinDesk embarked on a two-year quest seeking transparency. Ultimately, it was Tether's decision to release the sought-after documents. The goal was to unveil the financial backing of Tether, the world’s largest stablecoin, and to uncover any potential financial irregularities.
So what did the documents reveal? Simply put, Tether was accurate about their holdings. The files showed that Tether held billions of dollars in commercial paper issued by various international financial institutions and maintained funds in numerous banks worldwide. It also detailed the company's know-your-customer (KYC) protocols and other regulatory compliance procedures.
Tether has also been proactive in its communication, releasing a statement before any reporters had a chance to dissect the documents.
The conclusion of this extended ordeal has left the market feeling somewhat underwhelmed. Many expected dramatic revelations, financial impropriety, or at least some undisclosed issues.
Instead, the documents validated Tether's long-standing claims of being fully backed by reserves. Was the two-year pursuit a waste of resources, merely leading to a 'nothing burger'?
While some may argue that the chase was futile, it’s worth noting that the quest for transparency is never wasted. Tether's actions in response to this process, its willingness to provide documentation, and the ability to satisfy inquiries do more to enhance its reputation than undermine it.
In the fast-paced, frequently opaque world of digital assets, this saga has shown the importance of the pursuit of transparency, even when the result may seem anticlimactic.
CoinDesk’s pursuit may not have unveiled any earth-shattering revelations about Tether, but it has reinforced the need for due diligence and transparency in the sector. The demand for clear, open information in the digital asset market is undiminished, regardless of the outcome, and remains a vital part of maintaining trust and stability in the market.